KWSN Orbiting Fortress Forum Index KWSN Orbiting Fortress
KWSN Distributed Computing Teams forum
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Curious SETI
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    KWSN Orbiting Fortress Forum Index -> KWSN Round Table
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Old woman(mann, sorry)
Baron
Baron


Joined: 09 Nov 2007
Posts: 221
Location: Nottingham, England

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Much as I hate to admit defeat, today, after nearly 200 hours of crunching, it decided that I'd completed about 3% of it.
Enough is enough. Who do they thing they are, doing this kind of thing to people?
SETI is why I crunch in the first place! It satisfies part of my soul, I cancelled all other projects and devoted 100% of my PC to it and the only result is a waste of time, electricity and one pissed off volunteer.
I unchecked the AP boxes.
Mostly in sorrow.
Gits
_________________
[img]http://boincstats.boincstats.com/search/all_projects.php?cpid=8fbcb4ce48ba412ccbb4337d9d2bf18a.gif[/img]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Lloyd M.
Prince
Prince


Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 521

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Old woman(mann, sorry) wrote:
Much as I hate to admit defeat, today, after nearly 200 hours of crunching, it decided that I'd completed about 3% of it.
Enough is enough. Who do they thing they are, doing this kind of thing to people?


Golly, that sucks.

BTW, are you running optimized apps? Would you consider another project like Milkyway?
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lloyd M.
Prince
Prince


Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 521

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Adam Alexander wrote:
I've noticed on some projects that when you initially download WU's the estimates are very high, but improve as you do more work units.


I've found that it is pretty much the opposite, in real time, with Astropulse WUs
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lloyd M.
Prince
Prince


Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 521

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

KWSN glidersaur wrote:
You can set up a simple proportion. I have an AP WU that originally was benchmarked at 212 estimated hours to completion. [snip]


Well, you could if the math didn't keep changing while the WU was running, which is how it always seems to work with Astropulse WUs.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lloyd M.
Prince
Prince


Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 521

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Idan wrote:
Is it possible to change to the optimized client while crunching with the normal client? I mean, close the boinc manager, putting the optimized client in place and starting the boinc manager again without damaging the work done so far? I still have an AP WU half way through with 200+ hours of crunching that I wouldn't like to lose...


I hear you. If you stop BOINC entirely before updating the client, it should be fine.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Idan
UN-Smitten
Prince


Joined: 07 Dec 2005
Posts: 2993
Location: Tel-Aviv, Israel

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 6:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lloyd M. wrote:
Idan wrote:
Is it possible to change to the optimized client while crunching with the normal client? I mean, close the boinc manager, putting the optimized client in place and starting the boinc manager again without damaging the work done so far? I still have an AP WU half way through with 200+ hours of crunching that I wouldn't like to lose...


I hear you. If you stop BOINC entirely before updating the client, it should be fine.


I will lose about 350 hours of crunching in case it won't work... I'll try to backup everything before I do that, but if it won't work and I won't be able to restore it anyway, I will blame you and punish you by sending Sir Fart to release his bowels in your general direction #ni-1
_________________
Anyone for Crunch?


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KWSN glidersaur
Knight
Knight


Joined: 14 Feb 2009
Posts: 59
Location: Land of the Sacred Cheddar

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My first (and only) AP WU ran 109 hours, 59 minutes and 42 seconds. My estimate of 111 hours came pretty close. But I will not tie up one of my cores (I have only 2) on an AP unit again. I am now crunching the old multi-beam units and they list at 6+ hours, but I manage to get them out in about 4. I don't know what the folks at SETI are thinking with the AstroPulse B.S. I agree with those of you who are pi$$ed. A visit from Sir Fart to SETI is definitely in order!

#ni-1 #ni-1 #ni-1
_________________
Oops, that didn't work...how hot can a CPU get? This one is smoldering! Sad
Keeper of Rule Number 8 which is not important at the present, but it used to be.
I have no intelligent thoughts at this moment.
Ni!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    KWSN Orbiting Fortress Forum Index -> KWSN Round Table All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Optimized Seti@Home App | BOINC Stats