View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
rotciv KOTHRT Prince


Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Posts: 1482 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 12:03 pm Post subject: Water vs. Wine |
|
|
As Ben Franklin said: In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is freedom, in water there is bacteria.
In a number of carefully controlled trials, scientists have demonstrated that if we drink 1 liter of water each day, at the end of the year we would have absorbed more than 1 kilo of Escherichia coli, (E. coli) - bacteria found in feces. In other words, we are consuming
1 kilo of poop.
However, we do NOT run that risk when drinking wine & beer (or tequila, rum, whiskey or other liquor) because alcohol has to go through a purification process of boiling, filtering and/or fermenting.
Remember: Water = Poop, Wine = Health.
Therefore, it's better to drink wine and talk stupid, than to drink water and be full of shit.
There is no need to thank me for this valuable information: I'm doing it as a public service.  _________________ Sir Rotvic Knight of the Halfround Table
MAD, MAD I tell you.They're all MAD.
I am the only sane one here, my Doctor told me I was cured after the shock treatments. Big Brother Is Aways Watching.
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Grizzly Prince


Joined: 01 Jun 2002 Posts: 3136 Location: Creepy (Crawlley)
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 8:50 am Post subject: Re: Water vs. Wine |
|
|
rotciv KOTHRT wrote: | As Ben Franklin said: In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is freedom, in water there is bacteria.
In a number of carefully controlled trials, scientists have demonstrated that if we drink 1 liter of water each day, at the end of the year we would have absorbed more than 1 kilo of Escherichia coli, (E. coli) - bacteria found in feces. In other words, we are consuming
1 kilo of poop.
However, we do NOT run that risk when drinking wine & beer (or tequila, rum, whiskey or other liquor) because alcohol has to go through a purification process of boiling, filtering and/or fermenting.
Remember: Water = Poop, Wine = Health.
Therefore, it's better to drink wine and talk stupid, than to drink water and be full of shit.
There is no need to thank me for this valuable information: I'm doing it as a public service.  |
Umm , 1 Litre = 1000 gms water .
1 Year = 365 days
So , 365,000 gms water a year
1 Kilo = 1000 gms .
Divide and stuffs (365,000/1000) = 365 gms of E Colibottom a DAY
Perhaps me maffs is wrong - I sure hope so
Regds Grizz _________________ Oh Bugger Forgot again - or is it Oh Father Reboot again ?
Ps Grizz in his second childhood - but not his last !
Edihtor of the KoKC (excused spel;l checher'er)
AND NI !!! Tophat 10e
[img]http://www.katrinashome.com/grizzly_counter.php[/[url=http://www.katrinashome.com/] ][/url] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ercewee Duke


Joined: 19 May 2002 Posts: 429 Location: Anywhere!
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:02 am Post subject: Re: Water vs. Wine |
|
|
Grizzly wrote: |
Umm , 1 Litre = 1000 gms water .
1 Year = 365 days
So , 365,000 gms water a year
1 Kilo = 1000 gms .
Divide and stuffs (365,000/1000) = 365 gms of E Colibottom a DAY
Perhaps me maffs is wrong - I sure hope so
Regds Grizz |
1000/365,000= 2.7 mgram a day. Still a ridiculous amount. I guess the story is only true if you drink the water from a canal next to a sewage treatment plant.
edit: ehm... sorry 'da Griz' calculations made me dizzy
How about 1000/365? 2.7 gram a day.  _________________ 50.110 144.300 432.200 1296.200 2320.200 10368.200
Last edited by Ercewee on Wed Oct 03, 2007 11:56 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Grizzly Prince


Joined: 01 Jun 2002 Posts: 3136 Location: Creepy (Crawlley)
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 11:50 am Post subject: Re: Water vs. Wine |
|
|
Ercewee wrote: | Grizzly wrote: |
Umm , 1 Litre = 1000 gms water .
1 Year = 365 days
So , 365,000 gms water a year
1 Kilo = 1000 gms .
Divide and stuffs (365,000/1000) = 365 gms of E Colibottom a DAY
Perhaps me maffs is wrong - I sure hope so
Regds Grizz |
1000/365,000= 2.7 mgram a day. Still a ridiculous amount. I guess the story is only true if you drink the water from a canal next to a sewage treatment plant. |
Yep still a 1 mg a year !! (not a Kilo ) . How much tobaccco tar can I take a year then , and still be practisin' my coffin ?
Regds Grizz _________________ Oh Bugger Forgot again - or is it Oh Father Reboot again ?
Ps Grizz in his second childhood - but not his last !
Edihtor of the KoKC (excused spel;l checher'er)
AND NI !!! Tophat 10e
[img]http://www.katrinashome.com/grizzly_counter.php[/[url=http://www.katrinashome.com/] ][/url] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ercewee Duke


Joined: 19 May 2002 Posts: 429 Location: Anywhere!
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 12:13 pm Post subject: Re: Water vs. Wine |
|
|
Grizzly wrote: |
Yep still a 1 mg a year !! (not a Kilo ) . How much tobaccco tar can I take a year then , and still be practisin' my coffin ?
Regds Grizz |
hehehehe edit
The more tar, the longer your coffin will last.  _________________ 50.110 144.300 432.200 1296.200 2320.200 10368.200 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mohrorless Mail Order Goat Bride


Joined: 09 Oct 2006 Posts: 11206 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 _________________ Fetch me the Holy Hand Grenade!
Keeper of the Unending keg of PGGBs
Taunter in Training
Campaign Manager for Sir Shrubbery
Plus
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sir Furry Mark KWSN ArchBishop


Joined: 18 May 2002 Posts: 3261 Location: To the West of Iceni
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 12:16 pm Post subject: Re: Water vs. Wine |
|
|
Ercewee wrote: | Grizzly wrote: |
Umm , 1 Litre = 1000 gms water .
1 Year = 365 days
So , 365,000 gms water a year
1 Kilo = 1000 gms .
Divide and stuffs (365,000/1000) = 365 gms of E Colibottom a DAY
Perhaps me maffs is wrong - I sure hope so
Regds Grizz |
1000/365,000= 2.7 mgram a day. Still a ridiculous amount. I guess the story is only true if you drink the water from a canal next to a sewage treatment plant |
Ercewee you silly kow! I would have thought you knew all about measuring poop!
1 kilo / 365 days = 2.74 grams a day
Euucchh!
Ni!  _________________ (Sir Furry - Occasional member of the Migratory Coconuts)
"Never trust a computer you can't throw out a window." Steve Wozniak
  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sir Furry Mark KWSN ArchBishop


Joined: 18 May 2002 Posts: 3261 Location: To the West of Iceni
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OOOPS!
Much too slow with my last post (too many distractions here...)
SFM |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ercewee Duke


Joined: 19 May 2002 Posts: 429 Location: Anywhere!
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 12:20 pm Post subject: Re: Water vs. Wine |
|
|
Sir Furry Mark wrote: |
Ercewee you silly kow! I would have thought you knew all about measuring poop!
1 kilo / 365 days = 2.74 grams a day
Euucchh!
Ni!  |
I guess someone turned the looney magnet a notch too high.  _________________ 50.110 144.300 432.200 1296.200 2320.200 10368.200 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ercewee Duke


Joined: 19 May 2002 Posts: 429 Location: Anywhere!
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 12:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sir Furry Mark wrote: | OOOPS!
Much too slow with my last post (too many distractions here...)
SFM |
distraction? Like work?
same here.  _________________ 50.110 144.300 432.200 1296.200 2320.200 10368.200 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sir Papa Smurph Cries like a little girl


Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 4430 Location: Michigan
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I simply don't believe that amount.
This is a 2.7 gram tube of Arcti Silver-Ceramique. I can't believe that that there are that many colonies of bacteria in tap water and that we could not see them. _________________ a.k.a. Licentious of Borg.........Resistance Really is Futile.......
and a Really Hoopy Frood who always knows where his Towel is...
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mohrorless Mail Order Goat Bride


Joined: 09 Oct 2006 Posts: 11206 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sir Papa Smurph wrote: | I simply don't believe that amount.
This is a 2.7 gram tube of Arcti Silver-Ceramique. I can't believe that that there are that many colonies of bacteria in tap water and that we could not see them. |
If the vessel of water/amout of water was small enough, then you would see them because they would be concentrated into the small area.
As it is, that amount of matter is spread out through a year's consumption of water, therefore that amount imbibed at any one time is small enough to not be seen. _________________ Fetch me the Holy Hand Grenade!
Keeper of the Unending keg of PGGBs
Taunter in Training
Campaign Manager for Sir Shrubbery
Plus
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sir Papa Smurph Cries like a little girl


Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 4430 Location: Michigan
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No, that is not correct. 1 Kilogram divided by 365 days is 2.7 grams per day. The statement said one liter of water per day, which would mean 2.7 grams of E. coli per liter.
While I can accept that there is contamination in tap water I can't accept that there is that much of just E. coli, even dead. I can however accept that there is roughly 2.7 grams of dissolved solids per liter, but this would include numerous elements and compounds both soluble and insoluble.
We all know that water conducts electricity but did you know that pure H2O does not.
The reason that tap water conducts is because of contamination of soluble ions that actually allow the electrons to pass thru them. _________________ a.k.a. Licentious of Borg.........Resistance Really is Futile.......
and a Really Hoopy Frood who always knows where his Towel is...
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bpowe KWSN ArchBishop


Joined: 17 May 2002 Posts: 742 Location: San Angelo, Texas
|
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 1:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, Yes I am a chemist and have worked in labs for 30 years, so I am familiar with the conductivity of H2O...
Health Dept. regulations allow for about 1000 mg/L of mineral impurities in public drinking water (most sources are less than that, but not San Angelo, TX! ). The water is tested daily for E coli, two positive tests in a row requires the water utility to notify its customers that they need to boil their water until the problem is sorted out...
There could easily be 2.7 grams of dissolved and suspended solids in untreated surface water but I also can't believe there would be that much in normal city tap water... _________________ You can't leave footprints in the Sands of Time while sitting on your butt and who wants to leave Buttprints in the Sands of Time? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mohrorless Mail Order Goat Bride


Joined: 09 Oct 2006 Posts: 11206 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 5:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
My bad. Maybe I will not respond to anything people write if I am tired.....Naaahhhhhh. It's more fun that way.
Obviously they are wrong...... _________________ Fetch me the Holy Hand Grenade!
Keeper of the Unending keg of PGGBs
Taunter in Training
Campaign Manager for Sir Shrubbery
Plus
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sir Hamster of Elderberry KWSN ArchBishop

Joined: 20 May 2002 Posts: 5117 Location: Beer City, Cheese Quadrant
|
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 9:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
I also find the numbers hard to believe. E. Coli isn't the only bacteria out there, and if there were 2.7 grams/liter of E. Coli alone, then how much more other bacteria is in there? (Likely many times that).
I don't find this creditable, nor do I need any excuse to drink wine.
Also, one technical point: E. Coli is not poop, it eats poop. There is no accounting for taste!
ni! i!u |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jbyram2 Prince


Joined: 23 Jun 2004 Posts: 7129 Location: NMoP EpISdn
|
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Imagine that... an Email warning that turned out to be itself full of the same stuff it warned against... _________________ 0.0 Giggly hertzes Folding!
Go Diskless..Pure computing elegance, no frills
The brain I'm wearing makes me eat chocolate and cry!!
Something Completely different |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cow_tipping Prince

Joined: 19 May 2002 Posts: 2420 Location: On the run
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sir Hamster of Elderberry wrote: | I also find the numbers hard to believe. E. Coli isn't the only bacteria out there, and if there were 2.7 grams/liter of E. Coli alone, then how much more other bacteria is in there? (Likely many times that).
I don't find this creditable, nor do I need any excuse to drink wine.
Also, one technical point: E. Coli is not poop, it eats poop. There is no accounting for taste!
ni! i!u |
If E.coli eats poop;
then why would it be in clean water?
what does it consist of?
what in its "stomach"? _________________ SAVE THE WHALES. Collect the whole set.
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mildew KWSN ArchBishop


Joined: 13 Oct 2002 Posts: 2617 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
So...
E.Coli eats poop, therefore eating E.Coli is eating poop.
Cows eat grass, therefore eating hamburgers is like eating salad!
As usual, logic in these Inturnet facts are flawless  _________________
An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sir Hamster of Elderberry KWSN ArchBishop

Joined: 20 May 2002 Posts: 5117 Location: Beer City, Cheese Quadrant
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Cow_tipping wrote: | ...
If E.coli eats poop;
then why would it be in clean water?
what does it consist of?
what in its "stomach"? |
Maybe it's on holiday? (More likely it's spores out looking for more poop)
The letters "i" and "t".
What's in its stomach is what was in yours. (but technically, they don't have stomaches.)
Sir Mohrorless wrote: | My bad. Maybe I will not respond to anything people write if I am tired.....Naaahhhhhh. It's more fun that way.
|
Definitely more fun.
ni! i!u |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|