View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Mildew KWSN ArchBishop


Joined: 13 Oct 2002 Posts: 2617 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 1:50 pm Post subject: Issue with FaH |
|
|
I've noticed that the FaH client don't behave very well when sharing the processor. I have changed the advanced setting from Idle to Low, but the client appears to be running at Normal priority.
If I open the task manager, the process is logged as having priority Low.
I try to change it to Normal and back to Low, but nothing happens, it's still running at Normal priority...
Any one else noticed this? Would it help to change the settings back to Idle? (trying that would probably take a lot shorter time than writing all this, but I'm too lazy, and I'm behind on my post-count ) _________________
An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alpha_fruit Prince


Joined: 16 May 2005 Posts: 5805 Location: Western North Carolina, USA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know what you are talking about, how do you check this idle/low you are speaking of? I only run FAH and never had a problem lately with either machine. _________________ Don't fuss about growing older, many are denied the chance.
Last edited by alpha_fruit on Fri Dec 02, 2005 2:39 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mildew KWSN ArchBishop


Joined: 13 Oct 2002 Posts: 2617 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Right...
That's very helpful.
Thank you.
 _________________
An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Snrub Prince


Joined: 20 May 2003 Posts: 1916 Location: Someplace far away...yes, that'll do.
|
Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've never had a problem with FaH either.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sir Furry Mark KWSN ArchBishop


Joined: 18 May 2002 Posts: 3261 Location: To the West of Iceni
|
Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Can't say I've noticed a problem - at it's normal idle priority it usually yields well to other applications/projects. The exception to this is just after it starts, when it seems to do some sort of benchmarking/consistency checking at a higher priority for a minute or two...
Ni!  _________________ (Sir Furry - Occasional member of the Migratory Coconuts)
"Never trust a computer you can't throw out a window." Steve Wozniak
  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mildew KWSN ArchBishop


Joined: 13 Oct 2002 Posts: 2617 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 4:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Now I have a similar problem, but with the SoB client...
The setting is for Idle, but the task manager claims it is set to normal.
Trying to force SoB down ti Low priority in the task manager has no result.
The only way to run Majestic-12 on the same machine is to set that one to Higher than normal priority.
This is really weird, because it was working fine in the beginning, and then this problem just appeared.
Maybe it's my OS that's screwed...
Bill is back with a vengeance! _________________
An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sir Furry Mark KWSN ArchBishop


Joined: 18 May 2002 Posts: 3261 Location: To the West of Iceni
|
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 12:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bizarre - my experience is that Majestic-12 and SoB run well together. If anything Majestic is the one that takes over (when it is compressing a barrel just before uploading).
Windows actually has 32 different priority levels (from 0 to 31, where 31 is the highest). Windows itself can adjust priorities up or down by 2 points to rebalance the system.
The official names map as follows:
low = 4
belownormal = 6
normal = 8
high = 13
realtime = 24
If the OS chooses to rebalance, a low priority and a normal priority task can end up running at the same level!
I know that SoB trounces D2OL/TSC for CPU use, so maybe it is using an intermediate priority value as the task base priority? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Grawlfang Prince


Joined: 18 Feb 2005 Posts: 1256 Location: The Land of our lord JC, silly walks and all
|
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 7:12 pm Post subject: Re: Issue with FaH |
|
|
Mildew wrote: | I've noticed that the FaH client don't behave very well when sharing the processor. I have changed the advanced setting from Idle to Low, but the client appears to be running at Normal priority.
If I open the task manager, the process is logged as having priority Low.
I try to change it to Normal and back to Low, but nothing happens, it's still running at Normal priority...
Any one else noticed this? Would it help to change the settings back to Idle? (trying that would probably take a lot shorter time than writing all this, but I'm too lazy, and I'm behind on my post-count ) |
Nudge, Nudge, Wink, Wink...never has that problem (what is a "Task Manager" anyway...something similar to "top" is it) on Linux where are "renice -19" will do the trick.
Ni! and greets
Fang _________________ Listen; Strange women laying in ponds, distributing swords, is no basis for a system of government.
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|