KWSN Orbiting Fortress Forum Index KWSN Orbiting Fortress
KWSN Distributed Computing Teams forum
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

VOTE: Tie-breaker Jan. '12 / Einstein Vs. Number Fields

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    KWSN Orbiting Fortress Forum Index -> KWSN BOINC'ers
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Vote for CPU tie-breaker Jan. '12
Einstein
78%
 78%  [ 11 ]
Number Fields
21%
 21%  [ 3 ]
Total Votes : 14

Author Message
LanDroid
Prince
Prince


Joined: 11 Jun 2002
Posts: 4476
Location: Cincinnati, OH U.S.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 8:54 am    Post subject: VOTE: Tie-breaker Jan. '12 / Einstein Vs. Number Fields Reply with quote

With three votes each, it's another smack down - here are the two contestants.

Einstein
KWSN currently in 18th place, but should pass the University of Wisconsin later today. Stomp Factor is low, doesn't appear we'll pass anyone else in a month, but these GPU projects are hard to predict, don't know how high production will run if everyone stomps on it. And that's part of the attraction of voting for this one - CPU and GPU PotM's could both crunch the same project as Einstein is evidently still worthwhile for CPU's...

This project currently searches for pulsars in data from the giant Arecibo radio telescope. 16 have been found so far. This project also searches for Einstein gravitational-wave emissions from spinning neutron stars. So far this has not been successful and I get the impression it's less of a priority than pulsars - perhaps someone can verify that.

http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu/


Number Fields
KWSN is currently in 9th place. Stomp Factor is low to medium, looks like we might pass 2 or 3 teams in a month.

This is a math project, therefore over my head:
Quote:
NumberFields@home searches for fields with special properties. The primary application of this research is in the realm of algebraic number theory. Number theorists can mine the data for interesting patterns to help them formulate conjectures about number fields. Ultimately, this research will lead to a deeper understanding of the profound properties of numbers, the basic building blocks of all mathematics.
http://stat.la.asu.edu/NumberFields/


Vote quickly - 2012 starts in less than 2 days! Ni!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
The Knighty NI
Prince
Prince


Joined: 06 Sep 2007
Posts: 780
Location: Lost in space on a rather small Blue ping pong ball. :)

PostPosted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 1:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ni!
_________________
What is that in the Shrubbery?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Plomos
Prince
Prince


Joined: 26 Apr 2011
Posts: 859

PostPosted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 10:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Voted. As to the gravitational wave thing being less emphasized, its not necessarily less important, rather gravitational waves are invisible waves that have never been directly discovered so its more of a long shot to find some. Whereas the pulsars we know are there. Looks like sir Einstein is going to win this one
_________________

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    KWSN Orbiting Fortress Forum Index -> KWSN BOINC'ers All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Optimized Seti@Home App | BOINC Stats