 |
KWSN Orbiting Fortress KWSN Distributed Computing Teams forum
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Gemjunkie Prince


Joined: 03 Jul 2010 Posts: 3519 Location: Earth, lately
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Apparently DNETC had their server seized by the police in an illegal pirate torrent investigation, I haven't heard anything recently.
I've only used GPU's on DNETC, I don't even recall if it had a CPU option as a HD5870 would yield ~300k/day.
Quote: | Why are we doing the DNETC Client if we are supposed to be doing something else? |
You mean other than POTM? If it doesn't have a GPU app, you might as well keep them busy, plus people have their pet projects and personal milestone goals.
 _________________
(older, before split CPID)
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gemjunkie Prince


Joined: 03 Jul 2010 Posts: 3519 Location: Earth, lately
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 4:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How'd you sneak in there Stoop?
 _________________
(older, before split CPID)
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stooper101 Prince


Joined: 16 May 2009 Posts: 1248 Location: Cheese Country
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 _________________
>stats< |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gemjunkie Prince


Joined: 03 Jul 2010 Posts: 3519 Location: Earth, lately
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When did you squeeze in that training?
 _________________
(older, before split CPID)
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Killerrabbit Major Oblivion


Joined: 23 May 2002 Posts: 4656 Location: in a rabbit hole near you!!
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 12:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well that ends one of the best projects for KWSN.
Ni _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nuadormrac Prince

Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Posts: 506
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 1:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
I went to see if I could find anything on this seizure, and instead found the following. If this, in fact is one and the same project; I'm not sure I'd want to sign up with it. The complaint was that registered users in BOINC were getting their team assignment automatically set to the project's own team (with suggestion that the team that solves it gets the $1,000, so...sort of cheating argument). But the reply which was said to come from a forum mod, would be harsh to say the least; even threatening to delete points from anyone who posts to a thread which ever brings up the topic again.
I haven't actually crunched this project before; so will leave it for some who have, to chime in:
http://www.free-dc.org/forum/showthread.php?23710-Some-things-you-should-all-know-about.&s=258657795bf2dce25f2d3c7d0e5182b0
Quote: | I discovered a few things this morning that I want to share with all of you. It started with this statement from the DNETC web site.
Quote: | Own statistic for each user
Now every user has its own statistics on www.distributed.net and crunch on its own account 'xyz@dnetc.net' (Where 'xyz' is your BOINC nickname without special characters) I added in section 'Cross-project statistics' in 'Your account' link to distributed.net statistics 2 May 2010 11:29:47 UTC |
I followed the link and discovered that all of us using DNETC have been added to the DNETC team on distributed.net and as of now I've found no way to change that. If you look here you'll see that we've all been added to the DNETC team. I clicked on the Email password link but they obviously didn't use my email when signing me up for this.
This not only affects the stats but I discovered this is a pay project. The prize is $1000 for the individual that solves the problem. I currently have a 1 in 186 chance of doing this. There is also a $1000 prize for that persons team. Should I find the correct key I would want the team money to go here not DNETC.
I left a message on the message boards at DNETC. Until I find a way to change to the correct team I'm pulling the plug. |
Presumably a wrapper is being used, from the gist of the thread, and the project devs who created the wrapper have set things up so that everyone using the BOINC wrapper is inserted into their own team (rather then the user's own team) on the project's "official stats" page. The reason presumably for doing this, is the $1,000 pay out to the user, and another $1,000 pay out to the user's team; which through this would go to them, rather then the team they're actually associated with. If so, that would sound a little questionable; about the same as if an individual installed all these clients on everyone elses computer (lets say a worker at a computer shop put it on every computer they installed), and used their own account, to inflate their stats by having all their customers unknowingly crunch "for them".
Whatever the case is, or is not here (first I even heard of it, while looking for a report on the police seizing of the servers made above); someone else mentioned that a, lets just say rather threatening response made by the project admins, to the crunching community in a thread which had been made about this on their boards:
Quote: | They have responded
Not-so-friendly response from the project admin
Quote: | Ok we must clarified few things:
DNETC is wrapper based on BOIONC platform so you gain points in BOINC.
Making user account on distributed.net for each user registred on DNETC was made only for distributed.net devs to track users who make errors in computing.
If somebody is realy intrested in making points on distributed.net - please register there, download app and crunch.
This topic will be never discussed again.
Repeating this topic will erease points on account of every person posting without any warning. |
|
If this is the same project, and is how they feel it should be run/the manner in which people crunching for them should be addressed and dealt with; such would leave a bitter taste in my mouth. There's other projects, if they're one and the same, and the above is an accurate reflection of what's going on. In the end predictor@home tried using authority as a club upon anyone who mentioned a bug or problem with their project. People found Rosseta around the same time, and for protein predictor, such decisions didn't go so well for them. _________________
.
Last edited by Nuadormrac on Tue May 03, 2011 1:52 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Al Dente Prince


Joined: 23 Feb 2006 Posts: 3228 Location: Leodis, the jewel at the end of the yellow brick road (or M1)
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 7:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mmmmm... _________________ Creationists believe they never evolved; I agree with them.
. . My Milestones . . My Full BOINC list |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mildew KWSN ArchBishop


Joined: 13 Oct 2002 Posts: 2617 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
With the kind of effort and cost put into creating the BOINC project (wrapper) and running the servers for it, I'd say that $1000 is not much, and they deserve it if they get it.
The prize money is just symbolic anyway. I pay about $2000 in electricity alone every year running distributed computing, and then there's the hardware costs...
$1000 is a spit in the ocean, nothing to make a fuss over
 _________________
An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nuadormrac Prince

Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Posts: 506
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's dishonest to offer up $1,000 though, if one doesn't intend to pay it out fairly and legitimately; and rather dishonest to secretly bump everyone into one's team....
There's a certain trust when it comes to crunchers that things are being done above board, and that when a monetary prize is offered it's issued in a manner that wouldn't entail keeping it through less then honest means. If they don't want to pay, just be above board and don't offer it. Especially when business is entered into it; I'm sure everyone prefers an honest business man, if given the choice (and would offer repeat business). If say Robert Tilton or some such televangelist was caught pocketing donations, and making a little on the side, and it came to light, many knowing this to be the cause for instance might chose to offer their donation somewhere else (to help the victims of the Japanese tsunami for instance), instead... _________________
. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Knighty NI Prince

Joined: 06 Sep 2007 Posts: 780 Location: Lost in space on a rather small Blue ping pong ball. :)
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There are many cowboys out there. (Sorry to say this considering there are many legitimate cowboys who do a good job for ranchers).
In many ways they cheat decent honest people in one way or another. Many business people conduct business in such a way that they are stealing from people hence the name cowboy or rouge.
Sadly we have to guard against such practices and it makes me want to do dreadful perverse things to such people who would try and take advantage of us who want to give our time, effort and money to furthering science and the good of humanity.
#
Get back you swines.
Or I'll beat you  _________________ What is that in the Shrubbery?
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stooper101 Prince


Joined: 16 May 2009 Posts: 1248 Location: Cheese Country
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In regards to the prize money. The actual prize from RSA Labs is $10,000 to break the code. If you break it on your own, without using anybody else's software, you get the 10k. Distributed.net has devised there software which we all can use to try to crack the code. If your computer is the one that happens to crack it, the money will be divided according to d.net's predefined criteria found here: http://www.distributed.net/RC5. You'll see that the user would get 1000, and the user's team (if participating in a team) would get 1000. The rest goes either to d.net or non-profit.
Now (as far as I remember), if you were to use DNETC (boinc), the team money would go to DNETC. The individual money, well, I can't remember what was decided. All 2k may go to DNETC. But basically, DNETC had determined that the use of their software and servers earned a little payback too.
Keep in mind, there is another boinc project just emerging (Moo! Wrapper) which is set up by completely different people (I think) along the same lines as DNETC. I haven't even read any news/forums about this one so couldn't tell you what are their thoughts on the prize money.
So, in the end, some people are doing the RC5-75 code cracking for the money. Some for the excitement of trying to crack the code and realize there is a very small chance of your pc actually finding the solution and the fact the the amount of money put in to crunching the numbers may out-weigh the amount of prize money awarded. And some that do it for credits (the magical numbers of shrubberies that will some day determine who will rule the world).
Take it or leave it, that's how I understand it.
edit: If I had read d.net's page better, I would have known that RSA had discontinued there challenge and d.net is continuing to privately sponsor the prize. _________________
>stats< |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nuadormrac Prince

Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Posts: 506
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well it's the combination of automically putting everyone on their team; but then more to the point the harsh authoritarian reaction their mod gave, which, well....
If they get the 8k, team gets 1k, and individual gets 1k (as was originally stated), that'd be one thing. I of course think the same thing when I read about banks creating all these new fees (becase they compalin they're losing money not being able to charge over-draft fees, as if somehow they're entitled to the depositers money so they'll fee them however). But because there's time involved in crunching a project (and money in the form of electricity bills of which all I can say is PSE&G is well funded); both just looked a slap in the face.
Hopefully whatever project is setting up, will be more up front and honest with people.... Well and have mods that are more willing to work with the crunching community, as opposed to assuming the role of a mini-Mubarak _________________
. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sir Papa Smurph Cries like a little girl


Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 4430 Location: Michigan
|
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boinc itself should police the projects that are authorized to receive points and moderators like that should be Terminated....PERIOD
This is something that could easily be hijacked and misused...
A high profile scam could put an end to this forever.....
Just imagine trying to explain to your Boss/Spouse/Friend why their computer was being used to profit someone else at their expense... _________________ a.k.a. Licentious of Borg.........Resistance Really is Futile.......
and a Really Hoopy Frood who always knows where his Towel is...
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|