View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
null Squire
Joined: 04 Jan 2005 Posts: 16 Location: New England
|
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:14 pm Post subject: Sun Question |
|
|
Riddle me this and I shall join your team! Well, regardless, got to go with the knights either way.
I've right at 6,000 units completed and I've just brought two Sun 280R Servers online for the project. However, they are a wee bit (crapload) slower than I expected. What, pray tell, can I do to optimize these beasts?
Dave |
|
Back to top |
|
|
She Turned Me Into A Newt KWSN ArchBishop
Joined: 18 May 2002 Posts: 4911 Location: On an Alpaca farm
|
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It might help if we knew which project... _________________ I am Sî aliigi min en lacerto, a proud member of the Migratory Coconuts.
If lovin' ewe is wrong, I don't wanna be right. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
null Squire
Joined: 04 Jan 2005 Posts: 16 Location: New England
|
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:19 pm Post subject: Atch1 |
|
|
Indeed! This is the standard Seti@Home project. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KWSN - Den Store Mester Princess
Joined: 20 May 2002 Posts: 705 Location: Danish kvadrant, Greater Copenhagen area, formerly of the Orion Beltway
|
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:48 pm Post subject: Re: Atch1 |
|
|
null wrote: | Indeed! This is the standard Seti@Home project. |
Your memebership application have been approved.
According to the rules section VII, subcategory 11 you have been granted a full and complete pardon, there is still the matter of candid behaviour, but this being the quest for good, we see little reason to press on with the inquisatory computations.
I bid you NI!
_________________ NI! NI! NI!
KWSN - Den Store Mester |
|
Back to top |
|
|
She Turned Me Into A Newt KWSN ArchBishop
Joined: 18 May 2002 Posts: 4911 Location: On an Alpaca farm
|
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What version of Seti and what OpSys are the SUNS running? _________________ I am Sî aliigi min en lacerto, a proud member of the Migratory Coconuts.
If lovin' ewe is wrong, I don't wanna be right. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
null Squire
Joined: 04 Jan 2005 Posts: 16 Location: New England
|
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 2:02 pm Post subject: Seti & Sun Versions |
|
|
On the Suns I am running Sun OS 5.9.
Seti version is: setiathome-3.03.sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7
There is nothing else installed on the Suns right now, so I was rather surprised at the performance. Suggestions?
Dave |
|
Back to top |
|
|
She Turned Me Into A Newt KWSN ArchBishop
Joined: 18 May 2002 Posts: 4911 Location: On an Alpaca farm
|
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dave,
Not sure if we have any SUN OS experts, but I am moving this thread to the "Ye Olde Help Scrolls" discussion area. I will leave a shadow copy of it here.
Welcome to the team! And Ni!
Your Alpaca has ben shipped. _________________ I am Sî aliigi min en lacerto, a proud member of the Migratory Coconuts.
If lovin' ewe is wrong, I don't wanna be right. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KWSN - Den Store Mester Princess
Joined: 20 May 2002 Posts: 705 Location: Danish kvadrant, Greater Copenhagen area, formerly of the Orion Beltway
|
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 2:18 pm Post subject: Re: Seti & Sun Versions |
|
|
null wrote: | On the Suns I am running Sun OS 5.9.
Seti version is: setiathome-3.03.sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7
There is nothing else installed on the Suns right now, so I was rather surprised at the performance. Suggestions?
Dave |
BOINC???
I think we should be told.
_________________ NI! NI! NI!
KWSN - Den Store Mester |
|
Back to top |
|
|
She Turned Me Into A Newt KWSN ArchBishop
Joined: 18 May 2002 Posts: 4911 Location: On an Alpaca farm
|
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pretty sure the 3.03 indicates classic... _________________ I am Sî aliigi min en lacerto, a proud member of the Migratory Coconuts.
If lovin' ewe is wrong, I don't wanna be right. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
null Squire
Joined: 04 Jan 2005 Posts: 16 Location: New England
|
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 2:24 pm Post subject: Not BOINC |
|
|
*chuckle* Nope, not BOINC -- the old version. How is the BOINC Version? Obv I have not used it NOR kept up with the latest gimcrackery.
Dave |
|
Back to top |
|
|
null Squire
Joined: 04 Jan 2005 Posts: 16 Location: New England
|
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 2:40 pm Post subject: Alas |
|
|
Whooops. Well, I've determined I'm now screwed as I seem to be one of those folks who's email address has changed.
I figured I would install the BOINC Clients (which I will have to do anyway) but the account key business and all that....hmmmmm, maybe I can restore the domain ..... ah well. I should not have stood up when I was not being seen.
Dave |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KWSN - Den Store Mester Princess
Joined: 20 May 2002 Posts: 705 Location: Danish kvadrant, Greater Copenhagen area, formerly of the Orion Beltway
|
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 6:13 pm Post subject: Re: Alas |
|
|
null wrote: | Whooops. Well, I've determined I'm now screwed as I seem to be one of those folks who's email address has changed.
I figured I would install the BOINC Clients (which I will have to do anyway) but the account key business and all that....hmmmmm, maybe I can restore the domain ..... ah well. I should not have stood up when I was not being seen.
Dave |
Classic rules, alsas progress is sometimes a masqurade of digress. I have lost my borgs across Sol 3, and are merely BOINCing at the home komputer. Woefully slow, have just today (November 7th!!) completed the first shrub since November 7th.
Despite this you likely need to "upgrade" to the BOINC client..
_________________ NI! NI! NI!
KWSN - Den Store Mester |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mr. Snrub Prince
Joined: 20 May 2003 Posts: 1916 Location: Someplace far away...yes, that'll do.
|
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Congratulations on the successful membership! You have exceeded our strict requirements. Now you are among an honored few. Ni!
The servers wouldn't be the Special Edition Crapmaster 9000 (tm), would they? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jonnyv Happy Fun Admin
Joined: 15 May 2002 Posts: 2098 Location: Scottsdale, AZ
|
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 8:00 pm Post subject: Re: Sun Question |
|
|
null wrote: | Riddle me this and I shall join your team! Well, regardless, got to go with the knights either way.
I've right at 6,000 units completed and I've just brought two Sun 280R Servers online for the project. However, they are a wee bit (crapload) slower than I expected. What, pray tell, can I do to optimize these beasts?
Dave |
I think the major problem is that SPARCs are slow as crap as far as raw number crunching goes. If you moved to boinc, you might be able to extract a little extra performance via the compile-your-own option, but I wouldn't expect miracles. _________________ KWSN Forum Admin
Founding Member of the Migratory Coconuts |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sir Hamster of Elderberry KWSN ArchBishop
Joined: 20 May 2002 Posts: 5117 Location: Beer City, Cheese Quadrant
|
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 10:09 am Post subject: Re: Sun Question |
|
|
null wrote: | Riddle me this and I shall join your team! Well, regardless, got to go with the knights either way.
I've right at 6,000 units completed and I've just brought two Sun 280R Servers online for the project. However, they are a wee bit (crapload) slower than I expected. What, pray tell, can I do to optimize these beasts?
Dave |
I'm hardly an expert, but I used to run Seti@Home on a bunch of Sun Ultra 10's and Sun Blade 100's ... Slow, slow, slow, but having access to 10 of them made up for it. Built-in queing is a definite advantage for BOINC.
One advantage the Suns had with SETI is they run efficiently with any work units, where some computer (P3 especially) were very slow with Very Low Angle Range work units. I used to feed all my VLAR's to the Suns so my P3 would keep running fast. I have no idea if BOINC suffers from similar efficiency problems, but it seems likely that some BOINC projects might run more efficiently on your Suns. Finding out which one is best might be hard to do though. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
null Squire
Joined: 04 Jan 2005 Posts: 16 Location: New England
|
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 12:28 pm Post subject: thanks! |
|
|
Heya!
Thanks for all the comments. I will install the BOINC clients on all my systems and start anew I suppose. Alas and alack...who would 'ave expected the Lark vomit.
SO! I will now contribute the following processing power to you knights in exchange for a few virtual shrubberies.
2 Sun 280Rs
4 Sun V240s
10 IBM e310's (I think)
2 IBM 305s
1 Sony home PC
and, of course, my laptop.
Dave
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Fart in your gen direxion I am the goatse.cx guy
Joined: 24 May 2002 Posts: 2022 Location: Regrettably for you, I'm Upwind in Upstate N.Y.
|
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:16 pm Post subject: Re: thanks! |
|
|
null wrote: |
SO! I will now contribute the following processing power to you knights in exchange for a few virtual shrubberies.
|
Here are your virtual shrubberies .
You have five days to begin producing multitudinous amounts of pointage for the team or else the shrubs will begin to explode .
_________________ Ni ! Ni !
Flatulenty yours,
Sir Fart
The Prince of Noxious Fumigations
The Earl of Eruption
The Baron of Breaking Wind
The Marquis of the Malodorous
The Monarch of Methane
Loony Emeritus |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ToeBee KWSN Castellan
Joined: 30 Jun 2004 Posts: 601 Location: Manhattan, KS
|
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:42 pm Post subject: Re: Sun Question |
|
|
wohoo! another BOINCer! As was pointed out above, you might want to try a couple different projects. My laptop (1.3 GHz pentium-M) kicks my 2600+'s tail on seti@home but is significantly slower doing LHC@home work units. There are so many factors that influence performance... I think in this case it is the huge L2 cache on the Pentium-M (1 MB). Seti@home probably acesses memory in a fashion that yields higher cache hit ratios than LHC@home.
That being said, the only projects up and running right now are seti and climate prediction. But predictor and LHC should both be coming some time soon... hopefully
Sir Hamster of Elderberry wrote: |
One advantage the Suns had with SETI is they run efficiently with any work units, where some computer (P3 especially) were very slow with Very Low Angle Range work units. I used to feed all my VLAR's to the Suns so my P3 would keep running fast. I have no idea if BOINC suffers from similar efficiency problems, but it seems likely that some BOINC projects might run more efficiently on your Suns. Finding out which one is best might be hard to do though. |
Some work units do still take longer than other but the beauty of BOINC is that the work units that take longer also give you more credit so in the end it doesn't really matter.
And of course don't forget to check your BOINC stats on my BOINC stats website! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|