View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Skynet Knight

Joined: 14 Jan 2014 Posts: 43
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2015 1:31 pm Post subject: SETI@Home Wow!-Event 2015 |
|
|
SETI.Germany invites all BOINC teams to the SETI@Home Wow!-Event 2015. It takes place from 15th August, 16.00 UTC, until 29th August 2015, 16.00 UTC.
We cordially ask all team leaders to forward the invitation to their team. Information about the Wow! Race 2015, an exciting race concept and a registration form can be found here:
http://www.seti-germany.de/Wow/anmeldung.php?&lang=en
SETI.Germany wishes you and your team members much fun with the Wow! Event 2015.
Many Greatings: Skynet. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Blurf Prince

Joined: 03 Jan 2011 Posts: 1090 Location: Upstate NY
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2015 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Already in the thread on the same page--we don't need more threads about it. _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
branjo Prince


Joined: 05 Jan 2006 Posts: 746 Location: Slovakia
|
Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2015 12:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ĦIN!
 _________________
  
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JumpinJohnny Prince


Joined: 28 Mar 2013 Posts: 1247 Location: Western New Hamster
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LanDroid Prince


Joined: 11 Jun 2002 Posts: 4476 Location: Cincinnati, OH U.S.
|
Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2015 10:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
OK I need another lesson in bunkering, not something normally I do except for this event so it has been too long. I've tried to DL WUs, let them run, then suspend them once they reach abou 90%. But then I can't get any more WUs since Boinc knows I have suspended WUs. So I un-suspend them and can get a few more, but eventually it says I have too many and won't gimme anymore. That's about when I give up, send 'em all in and just shrub normally.
Is there a better system? I recall one where you disable internet access and just let 'em shrub. Perhaps it's all in the timing and getting the cache of WUs sized properly? If so, need details on how to do that; I've forgotten how and I'm too lazy too look it up.
On edit: Just found this instruction that states a 10 day cache is possible, is that the key? Ni?
http://www.seti-germany.de/Wow/54_en_Supply%20with%20wu.html _________________ [img]http://stats.free-dc.org/cpidtagb.php?cpid=6533a276b3a1dde393be350eb3cfda70&theme=16&cols=5/.png[/img]
[img]http://stats.free-dc.org/badgesbanner.php?cpid=6533a276b3a1dde393be350eb3cfda70/.png[/img] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Plomos Prince

Joined: 26 Apr 2011 Posts: 859
|
Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2015 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I set my max work buffer to 10 for 10 days worth of work since the deadlines aren't until next month. This allowed me to download 95 WUs and I turned off network communication in boinc after that so that I can run all 95 and then upload them all once the contest starts. _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
[KWSN] multijumper Knight


Joined: 26 Aug 2013 Posts: 49 Location: Warsaw / Poland
|
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2015 4:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Recent work on the app ATI / NVIDIA, ready to race - 100%
Ni! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JumpinJohnny Prince


Joined: 28 Mar 2013 Posts: 1247 Location: Western New Hamster
|
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2015 2:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Plomos wrote: | I set my max work buffer to 10 for 10 days worth of work ... and I turned off network communication in boinc after that .... |
You can also bunker by firewall rule and still run BOINC on other projects.
SETTING UP A RULE WITH WINDOWS FIREWALL for WIN7
CONTROL PANEL > WINDOWS FIREWALL > Advanced Settings
On the left side of the panel
OUTBOUND RULES
On right side of panel
NEW RULE
CUSTOM - NEXT
All Programs - NEXT
NEXT
Under "Which remote IP addresses does this rule apply to?"
THESE IP ADDRESSES - ADD
THIS IP RANGE
From 208.68.240.0 EDIT.
To 208.68.240.255
OK - NEXT
Block the connection - NEXT
check Domain, Private, Public - NEXT
Name your rule ie BLOCK SETI - FINISH
To REMOVE the rule go to OUTBOUND RULES, highlight the rule, then on the right side click on DELETE and then YES.
The only downside is you won't be able to communicate with SETI on that computer. You would have to do message boards and account checks on a different rig without the firewall rule set.
Last edited by JumpinJohnny on Wed Aug 05, 2015 1:47 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Plomos Prince

Joined: 26 Apr 2011 Posts: 859
|
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2015 3:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Won't the firewall method only give you a handful of seti tasks at a normal buffer number because of it needing to balance between several projects?
Edit I set up the rule and re enabled network for boinc and my whole bunker cleared out and reported everything back. I set the rule to block the remote ip's that you listed, not sure where it went wrong but it did not block the transmission, but it does block the website so something must be different _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JumpinJohnny Prince


Joined: 28 Mar 2013 Posts: 1247 Location: Western New Hamster
|
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2015 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Plomos wrote: | Won't the firewall method only give you a handful of seti tasks at a normal buffer number because of it needing to balance between several projects? |
Yes, you have to get your SETI tasks first and can only get 100 per Client.
... Unless you have a multi boot machine running multiple clients as illustrated in these brilliant plans:

Last edited by JumpinJohnny on Wed Aug 05, 2015 1:48 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Plomos Prince

Joined: 26 Apr 2011 Posts: 859
|
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2015 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Had to let my laptop go back to reporting tasks because it had some DDMs that finished and we need the points. Main shrubber has made it through 55 of its 99 so far so it still has time before it finishes and will need more. Has anyone found that ip yet? _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JumpinJohnny Prince


Joined: 28 Mar 2013 Posts: 1247 Location: Western New Hamster
|
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2015 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I cannot yet pinpoint the SETI IP they use for sending WU.
I tried using an IP lookup program and plugging in addresses listed in my P2P blocker allowed log. Just couldn't pin it down... yet.
.......
Here is a little more on the subject>> http://www.dunadd.co.uk/seti/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=2092
the only IP I can get for SETI is 169.229.217.150 ... that doesn't work.
........
EDIT: Good work Plomos finding the correct range for firewall IP blocking
Last edited by JumpinJohnny on Wed Aug 05, 2015 1:55 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Plomos Prince

Joined: 26 Apr 2011 Posts: 859
|
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2015 1:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
I had to sacrifice a bunch of units to being uploaded and reported to find this out, but thanks to a handy program called wireshark (that I forgot I had) I have located the ip needed.
To block SETI communication i blocked 208.68.240.0 - 208.68.240.255
The ip that it was uploading to was 208.68.240.16 so i have range blocked to be safe since they have multiple servers. I confirmed because the ip is registered to Berkley and Seti specifically. Double checked by finishing a unit and it does not upload with the rule enabled and network communication via boinc enabled. _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JumpinJohnny Prince


Joined: 28 Mar 2013 Posts: 1247 Location: Western New Hamster
|
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Plomos wrote: | .....Double checked by finishing a unit and it does not upload with the rule enabled and network communication via boinc enabled. |
The proof is in the elderberry logs.
Quote: | 8/5/2015 3:19:21 AM | SETI@home | Requesting new tasks for CPU
8/5/2015 3:19:22 AM | SETI@home | Scheduler request failed: Couldn't connect to server
8/5/2015 3:19:26 AM | | Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site
8/5/2015 3:19:27 AM | | Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down.
|
The nice thing is, this leaves open the SETI main server !!! Can Bunker and continue PM invitations at the same time.
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bullocks Duke

Joined: 15 Feb 2005 Posts: 416 Location: Here.
|
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2015 5:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Question for those in the know?
I keep getting Seti GPU wu's for my ati integrated freezing up. they'll run for hours with no movement, eventually I get fed up and pause them, they'll them restart, normally resetting to just just a hour or two duration, only to freeze again later?
'Tis a reet pain in zee bottom, so gave up and just crunching the CPU's _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JumpinJohnny Prince


Joined: 28 Mar 2013 Posts: 1247 Location: Western New Hamster
|
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2015 8:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bullocks wrote: | Question for those in the know? |
So I'm going to ignore that 'in the know' because I want to guess.
I'm assuming that you are using Lunatics SETI Optimiser.
By "integrated GPU" I'm assuming you mean it's an APU rather than a "video card" with CPU.
Some observations:
The checkpointing for the Astropulse V7 ati WU's is very long; it sits at 'Time Remaining' for a very long time. When you restart it it goes back to the last checkpoint time it passed.
Even though the 'Time Remaining' number isn't moving, a resource meter shows it the ati APv7 is doing it's business. (Sending periodic info to the slot log files and using a small portion of a CPU core.)
Since you say it goes for a "very long time" without running, it may be that the ati part of your APU needs a core free on to operate the APv7.
What if you leave a core of the CPU free for the GPU by using an app_config.xml that also limits the GPU usage?
Quote: | <app_config>
<app>
<name>setiathome_v7</name>
<max_concurrent>3</max_concurrent>
</app>
<app>
<name>astropulse_v7</name>
<gpu_versions>
<gpu_usage>0.5</gpu_usage>
</gpu_versions>
</app>
</app_config> |
*for windoz create in notepad and put in C:\ProgramData\BOINC\projects\setiathome.berkeley.edu
Definitely NOT in the know but I love to guess. Hopefully someone can give you a better answer... _________________
  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Plomos Prince

Joined: 26 Apr 2011 Posts: 859
|
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2015 11:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ya Johnny I'm just glad I finally found the blasted ip. That's what happens when I'm up in the middle of the night and get obsessed over fixing a nerd issue.
As for the integrated issue i am not sure. Sometimes it takes a while for my integrated intel gpu to crunch but that is because some of them are longer units. Johnny's guess seems plausible enough to try and see. _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bullocks Duke

Joined: 15 Feb 2005 Posts: 416 Location: Here.
|
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2015 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks JJ but the setting hadn't been changed and I am only now experiencing the problem. Is this an optimizer update issue?
I cannot remember any taking 10 hrs = 24%before I suspended it
None are listed as astropulse and I do not have it enabled
It was set to use no more the 80% of the cores so in my theory surely one core would always be available on a quad core?? Task claims it's using no more than 0.04 of a core +1 AMD/ATI GPU Does any of that make sense, I'll frame if it does. _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Plomos Prince

Joined: 26 Apr 2011 Posts: 859
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JumpinJohnny Prince


Joined: 28 Mar 2013 Posts: 1247 Location: Western New Hamster
|
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2015 4:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sir Bullocks a.k.a. Crabby Patty,
if you look at: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=4287925366 for a "successful" result
- it shows that it took less than 2 hours runtime.
- it was restarted at 48.69% and restarted twice at 50.9%
- before the first restart there was a recompile issue that it gave up on ?????
You should be running Lunatics Unified Win64 v0.43 (a) or (b) on that computer.
If you need to update or reinstall the Lunatics, I would dump all your seti work, suspend SETI, Exit BOINC and Uninstall your old Lunatics Optimizer first.
Many of the AstroPulse_v7 are various sizes and some might take your computer 6 to 10 hours.
The gpu part of your APU should do the setiathome_v7 WU in about the same time as your cpu cores, around 2 1/2 hours.
Something is amiss...
Last edited by JumpinJohnny on Thu Aug 06, 2015 1:02 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|