| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Michael H.W. Weber
Squire
Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 18
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 12:28 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Please keep an eye on your machine to check whether the problem is already solved with the new BOINC version and let me know what is happening.
Michael.
_________________
http://www.rnaworld.de |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yoyo
Squire
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 7
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 1:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What I can see in 2 of your inconclusive results.
http://www.rnaworld.de/rnaworld/workunit.php?wuid=5221250
Your uploaded zip file has errors:
bad CRC be068679 (should be 4fc0286c)
And in the results are also differences with your wingman:
| Code: | diff -r 2/cms_GA-p[BR-Lin64f]_Bacillus-cereus-AH820_CP001283.lin.EMBL_RF00199_SL2_1306858323_11151_0 3/cms_GA-p[BR-Lin64f]_Bacillus-cereus-AH820_CP001283.lin.EMBL_RF00199_SL2_1306858323_11151_0
19164c19164
< 1550458 GGUCUUCAACCGUCuUCAGaaAUAACUGAGAUGAAGUAUCAA-GCAUUUCUAGAUGCGGU 1550400
---
> 1550458 GGUCUUCAACCGUCuUCAGaaAUAACUGAGAUGAAGUAUCAA-GCAUUUCUAGAUGCGGU 155048AAC 40GG UAUUU 1387403
|
The same here http://www.rnaworld.de/rnaworld/workunit.php?wuid=5221081
Unzip leads to
bad CRC 09cb3d06 (should be c7e5d408)
And also differences in the data
| Code: | diff -r 0/cms_GA-p[BR-Lin64f]_Bacillus-cereus-AH187_CP001177.cir.EMBL_RF00894_mir-790_1306858323_10447_0 2/cms_GA-p[BR-Lin64f]_Bacillus-cereus-AH187_CP001177.cir.EMBL_RF00894_mir-790_1306858323_10447_0
25353,25354c25353,25356
< Query = 1 - 71, Target = 4468195 - 4468236
< Score = 3.05, E = 1.728e+004, P = 0.01045, GC = 38
---
> Query = 1 - 71, Target = 4468190.010 1436 - 71CaGgcG 71
> : <<<<<-<<<<~~~~~~>>>>->>>>>:
> G1.728e+004, P = 004, P =<<-<<get = 533130.10, E Target CAAACA:: G
> 1427850 AAUU= 0.0
|
So the validator detects it and an additional result is generated and send to some user. If this returns it is compared with the 2 already existing results and this doesn't match with your result so it becomes invalid.
yoyo |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
John Galt 007
Prince
Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Posts: 1206
Location: Wisconsin
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yoyo wrote: | What I can see in 2 of your inconclusive results.
http://www.rnaworld.de/rnaworld/workunit.php?wuid=5221250
Your uploaded zip file has errors:
bad CRC be068679 (should be 4fc0286c)
And in the results are also differences with your wingman:
| Code: | diff -r 2/cms_GA-p[BR-Lin64f]_Bacillus-cereus-AH820_CP001283.lin.EMBL_RF00199_SL2_1306858323_11151_0 3/cms_GA-p[BR-Lin64f]_Bacillus-cereus-AH820_CP001283.lin.EMBL_RF00199_SL2_1306858323_11151_0
19164c19164
< 1550458 GGUCUUCAACCGUCuUCAGaaAUAACUGAGAUGAAGUAUCAA-GCAUUUCUAGAUGCGGU 1550400
---
> 1550458 GGUCUUCAACCGUCuUCAGaaAUAACUGAGAUGAAGUAUCAA-GCAUUUCUAGAUGCGGU 155048AAC 40GG UAUUU 1387403
|
The same here http://www.rnaworld.de/rnaworld/workunit.php?wuid=5221081
Unzip leads to
bad CRC 09cb3d06 (should be c7e5d408)
And also differences in the data
| Code: | diff -r 0/cms_GA-p[BR-Lin64f]_Bacillus-cereus-AH187_CP001177.cir.EMBL_RF00894_mir-790_1306858323_10447_0 2/cms_GA-p[BR-Lin64f]_Bacillus-cereus-AH187_CP001177.cir.EMBL_RF00894_mir-790_1306858323_10447_0
25353,25354c25353,25356
< Query = 1 - 71, Target = 4468195 - 4468236
< Score = 3.05, E = 1.728e+004, P = 0.01045, GC = 38
---
> Query = 1 - 71, Target = 4468190.010 1436 - 71CaGgcG 71
> : <<<<<-<<<<~~~~~~>>>>->>>>>:
> G1.728e+004, P = 004, P =<<-<<get = 533130.10, E Target CAAACA:: G
> 1427850 AAUU= 0.0
|
So the validator detects it and an additional result is generated and send to some user. If this returns it is compared with the 2 already existing results and this doesn't match with your result so it becomes invalid.
yoyo |
The real question is why does it do it sometimes and not other times? I will run a few more and see what happens...
_________________
http://stephenbrooks.org/muon1/banner.php?user=[KWSN]John%20Galt%20007
http://stats.free-dc.org/mosttag.php?cpid=f7e8c5dfbccfce7e6054e7a84c151aa4&theme=4.png
( )Y( ) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gemjunkie
Prince
Joined: 03 Jul 2010
Posts: 3519
Location: Earth, lately
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
These WU's can run for an awful long time after reaching 100%. These hit 100% at 61, 69, and ~87 hrs.
Finished at ~114hrs.:
_________________
(older, before split CPID)
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Michael H.W. Weber
Squire
Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 18
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gemjunkie wrote: | | These WU's can run for an awful long time after reaching 100%. These hit 100% at 61, 69, and ~87 hrs. |
With some of the WUs this is completely normal behaviour and no indication at all for malfunction. So just keep them running. It has to do with the algorithm used in the app that has stochastic elements which make exact runtime predictions difficult if not impossible.
Michael.
_________________
http://www.rnaworld.de |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Norman_RKN
Grunt
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 2
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
it seems to be a little bit unclear for users about xxl and s and what they do/we mean.
so we have modified the apps-name to:
cmsearch XXL (large) 1.0.2
cmsearch S (small) 1.0.2
and we hope it΄s now easy to understand what we mean with xxl and s 
is it better ?! any suggestion ?
by the way... great output of KWSN ! thx ! 
Norman
(sorry for the double post)
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
John Galt 007
Prince
Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Posts: 1206
Location: Wisconsin
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Michael H.W. Weber
Squire
Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 18
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| John Galt 007 wrote: | | Michael H.W. Weber wrote: | Please keep an eye on your machine to check whether the problem is already solved with the new BOINC version and let me know what is happening.
Michael. |
All 3 machines that had been giving me problems are OK now....maybe they just needed a reboot.... |
Good.
Michael.
_________________
http://www.rnaworld.de |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gemjunkie
Prince
Joined: 03 Jul 2010
Posts: 3519
Location: Earth, lately
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My i5 threw a few blue screens with the message "memory_management". 
Then every WU errored out at ~1min. (all small WU's).
I pulled it from service while I investigate, it has my GTX570 in it, too. 
I put the Q9950 on the line.
_________________
(older, before split CPID)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gemjunkie
Prince
Joined: 03 Jul 2010
Posts: 3519
Location: Earth, lately
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2011 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I tried my i5 again, even turning the speed down, it still produces computation errors and blue screens. I ran through the RNA cache and switched to other projects. It's working flawlessly again so far, back at 4.09GHz.
_________________
(older, before split CPID)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gemjunkie
Prince
Joined: 03 Jul 2010
Posts: 3519
Location: Earth, lately
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 9:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is anyone else having trouble getting WU's? I'm getting WU's for Linux but just a trickle for Windows, not enough for all cores.
_________________
(older, before split CPID)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The Knighty NI
Prince
Joined: 06 Sep 2007
Posts: 780
Location: Lost in space on a rather small Blue ping pong ball. :)
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Probably SETI.Germany eating up everything that's available as they have done over 900k today.
_________________
What is that in the Shrubbery?
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gemjunkie
Prince
Joined: 03 Jul 2010
Posts: 3519
Location: Earth, lately
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 4:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WU's are flowing again. I guess they filled their caches. 
_________________
(older, before split CPID)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
