 |
KWSN Orbiting Fortress KWSN Distributed Computing Teams forum
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Professor Bruce Grunt

Joined: 18 Aug 2008 Posts: 2 Location: Johnson City,TN
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 5:38 pm Post subject: A New Day, A New Knight |
|
|
If all goes well, in 48 hours the U.S. contingent of Knights will have a President that won't be a global embarassment and will work, I believe, to make us citizens of the world again. On behalf of a lot of us, thanx for putting up with Bush's shit for too long now. We're working on it.
...and to my fellow Knight, the poet who posted "The Night Before...", the biggest socialists in my lifetime were Nixon, Reagan and W. Why is it "socialism" when someone tries to cut the average person a break and not socialism when we bail out Wall Street for 850 billion dollars or give corporations no-bid contracts as a license to steal? _________________ Professor Bruce |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yankton Prince


Joined: 27 Sep 2008 Posts: 1702 Location: California
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 6:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Neither of our two major parties are anything and haven't been for a long time. They are red vs. blue. petty, conniving and dishonest. They are both so far on the bottom of the political spectrum that they are two sides of the same coin. No matter which of them comes out on top tomorrow, the rest of us all lose. _________________ Some days are worse than others. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mohrorless Mail Order Goat Bride


Joined: 09 Oct 2006 Posts: 11206 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It appears we have a Democrat as a new knaggit. Don't believe everything you read Bruce. The all too liberal media (for years) has said nothing good about conservative people and nothing bad about liberal people.
Politicians are like diapers. They should be changed often and for the same reason. _________________ Fetch me the Holy Hand Grenade!
Keeper of the Unending keg of PGGBs
Taunter in Training
Campaign Manager for Sir Shrubbery
Plus
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sir Hamster of Elderberry KWSN ArchBishop

Joined: 20 May 2002 Posts: 5117 Location: Beer City, Cheese Quadrant
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Welcome Professor Bruce! Or, in my usual style Sir Professor Bruce!! It it OK if we just call you Bruce instead of Bru... ooo oh wait, you are already called that ... can we call you Sheila instead?
ni! i!u
----------------------------------------------------------
"The Night Before..." as well as "Dear Fellow Business Owners" are political posts making the rounds of all the conservative sites and anywhere else. I made some effort to track down the original, but apparently these folks aren't big on attribution. I strongly suspect there is a group of people actively trying to spread these things around as a weird sort of campaign effort. More evidence of conservative frustration.
This hasn't been such a great campaign for the conservatives, and I've read that this may be part of the larger political cycles turning back to the liberal side (pay attention to what Matt Moon writes - not the gnashing of teeth in the comments).
I am sorely tempted to rant about the Republican party letting down their side of the two-party system. They (the party) ought to be doing better, but have let themselves get bogged down with issues that ought not to be political, and have lost sight of what used to be conservative principles.
But what do I know - I just repeat what the squirrels tell me.  _________________ -- Have you seen my goat? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mohrorless Mail Order Goat Bride


Joined: 09 Oct 2006 Posts: 11206 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sir Hamster of Elderberry wrote: | [snip]weird sort of campaign effort[/snip] |
As compared to what non-wierd campaign effort of the last 20 years?
Sir Hamster of Elderberry wrote: | I am sorely tempted to rant about the Republican party letting down their side of the two-party system. They (the party) ought to be doing better, but have let themselves get bogged down with issues that ought not to be political, and have lost sight of what used to be conservative principles. |
I believe BOTH parties have gotten away from their core principals & are now controlled by a few power hungry people. The ones trying to make a difference are pushed to the side (mainly because they aren't/won't/don't kiss the asses of those few in control).
The Democrats are hanging on to the memory of JFK. They despretly want Camelot to return. They claim that Clinton was the second coming of JFK, not so. He was someone that got elected and got lucky with the financial markets being real good at the time. Carter was a nice guy, but overmatched as President. He was too much of a Pacifist, other countries saw this and took advantage. Hopefully he will be better remembered for his work with Habitat for Humanity - that is the big public accomplishment in his life and it is an extremely good one.
The Republicans want Regan back. I can't blame them. He helped restore some pride in the country after the previous 20 years. But some things went his way too. The Soviet Union couldn't afford to keep up in the arms race (ironic - Socialism failed because they didn't have the capital). Regan looks like a hero. Bush Senior was good too. He had the brains, the international experience and it worked for him. Unfortunately, one line cost him a second term. "Read my lips". That cost him. Nixon was a very smart man, not too ethical. Ford had no chance. He was stained by Nixon. He did the right thing by pardoning Nixon so the country could move foward and avoid years of problems and distractions, in the end, that cost Ford (see Monica Lewinsky as to how a country can get distracted).
I just hope/pray that the best person gets elected today. The one that can help fix the problems. There is no immediate fix. It will take years. Neither side is completely right or wrong. They both have decent ideas. the best route is down the middle somewhere. Unfortunately neither party seems willing to work with the other. _________________ Fetch me the Holy Hand Grenade!
Keeper of the Unending keg of PGGBs
Taunter in Training
Campaign Manager for Sir Shrubbery
Plus
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sir Hamster of Elderberry KWSN ArchBishop

Joined: 20 May 2002 Posts: 5117 Location: Beer City, Cheese Quadrant
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 10:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Anyone remember when the Republicans used to be the party of fiscal responsibility? Now they spend as much as they accuse the Democrats of spending, and run up the deficit instead of paying as we go (Reagan started that). "Read my lips ..." did hurt Bush (the Elder), but that sound bite wouldn't have stuck except for the runaway spending and it's effects on the economy, which left Bush with no real choice but to raise taxes. Bush (the Younger) did essentially the same things (for aurguably different reasons), and this policy has come back to bite them twice now. The Democrats (Clinton) took over the responsible position for themselves, as even "Tax and Spend" is more responsible than "Don't Tax and Spend Anyway".
As an aside - Freakonomics has some interesting graphical comparisons of McCain and Obama tax plans.
In addition to his Habitat for Humanity work, Carter has been really outstanding in the role of Elder Statesman through The Carter Center and other activities. I rather agree with Sir Mohrorless about Carter, "nice" isn't really a quality that makes a good president.
I would suggest, without knowing quite how to say it, that we ought to consider just what sort of nastiness makes a good leader, and be willing to tolerate it in our political candidates.
Sir Mohrorless wrote: | (see Monica Lewinsky as to how a country can get distracted) |
The Republicans were certainly distracted, but everyone else got over it. I consider myself somewhere between Liberal/Moderate, and even I think Clinton deserved at least censure. The Republicans tried to make it into something bigger than it was, but ended up doing nothing. This was (IMLO) nothing short of incompetence.
Sir Mohrorless wrote: | I just hope/pray that the best person gets elected today. The one that can help fix the problems. There is no immediate fix. It will take years. Neither side is completely right or wrong. They both have decent ideas. the best route is down the middle somewhere. Unfortunately neither party seems willing to work with the other. |
I'm with you there, and I'm glad we can have a nice discussion about it too. Perhaps cooperation starts at the bottom and trickles up?
Dan _________________ -- Have you seen my goat? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KWSN Im Not Dead Prince


Joined: 10 Apr 2007 Posts: 710 Location: East Tennessee
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
At this point i'd be happy with someone that was given a sword at a lake by a slightly moist woman! _________________
KWSNImNotDead - "I don't want to go on the cart!". It is spelled LooNies. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sir Hamster of Elderberry KWSN ArchBishop

Joined: 20 May 2002 Posts: 5117 Location: Beer City, Cheese Quadrant
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
KWSN Im Not Dead wrote: | At this point i'd be happy with someone that was given a sword at a lake by a slightly moist woman! |
Loose women lying about in ponds and distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!!!
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mohrorless Mail Order Goat Bride


Joined: 09 Oct 2006 Posts: 11206 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sir Hamster of Elderberry wrote: | Sir Mohrorless wrote: | (see Monica Lewinsky as to how a country can get distracted) |
The Republicans were certainly distracted, but everyone else got over it. I consider myself somewhere between Liberal/Moderate, and even I think Clinton deserved at least censure. The Republicans tried to make it into something bigger than it was, but ended up doing nothing. This was (IMLO) nothing short of incompetence. |
What Clinton did with Lewinsky was between himself, her and the wife. It's the purjury about the whole thing that he gat away with that annoys me. You or I would have done time for it, yet the Democrats think it was acceptable and the Republicans think he should have been stoned (err, umm, maybe he was) correction, hung....(oh dear, I really don't want to know if he was/is hung), let's just say burned at the stake. Yes that's what the Republicans (most of them) wanted.
Sir Hamster of Elderberry wrote: | I'm with you there, and I'm glad we can have a nice discussion about it too. Perhaps cooperation starts at the bottom and trickles up? |
I tend to run in the Conservative mode. I think I am careful and cautious. When the safety of the country is at stake, run a deficit for a little while, raise taxes to pay for the war that is about to happen to re-secure the country (it worked just fine uring WWII). Then return to normal.
Don't kid yourselves. The Democrats aren't the masters of frugality. They just spent it differently. _________________ Fetch me the Holy Hand Grenade!
Keeper of the Unending keg of PGGBs
Taunter in Training
Campaign Manager for Sir Shrubbery
Plus
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Professor Bruce Grunt

Joined: 18 Aug 2008 Posts: 2 Location: Johnson City,TN
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Fellow Prisoners:
Like Chris Matthews, I have a tingling feeling in my leg, but, alas, it may have only fallen asleep. To respond to the responses, the Knights don't have a new member that is Democrat - I voted Green (in a Red state), with ample apologies to Red Green.
Secondly, I am pleased to be part of this online community dedicated to the Pythons and wish to remind you that there is really no telling what an agnostic can do if he really doesn't know whether he believes in anything or not.
Crack the tubes - and vote Very Silly Party. _________________ Professor Bruce |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yankton Prince


Joined: 27 Sep 2008 Posts: 1702 Location: California
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just 'cause some watery tart threw a sword at you!
 _________________ Some days are worse than others. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KWSN Im Not Dead Prince


Joined: 10 Apr 2007 Posts: 710 Location: East Tennessee
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well the Redskins lost last Night meaning the Dems will win: <<link>> _________________
KWSNImNotDead - "I don't want to go on the cart!". It is spelled LooNies. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mohrorless Mail Order Goat Bride


Joined: 09 Oct 2006 Posts: 11206 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Holds no water. Read your own link. Being a 'Skins fan I happen to now of the myth and also know that they LOST their last home game before the 2004 election. Bush won the elsection.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Washington_Redskins_season _________________ Fetch me the Holy Hand Grenade!
Keeper of the Unending keg of PGGBs
Taunter in Training
Campaign Manager for Sir Shrubbery
Plus
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KWSN Im Not Dead Prince


Joined: 10 Apr 2007 Posts: 710 Location: East Tennessee
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
mohrorless wrote: | Holds no water. Read your own link... |
I did read the link, did you? With the exception of the 2004 election, this has held true and it held true again last night.
Lets run them down:
1936: Dems were in control, Redskins won, Dems won (1-0)
1940: Dems were in control, Redskins won, Dems won (2-0)
1944: Dems were in control, Redskins won, Dems won (3-0)
1948: Dems were in control, Redskins won, Dems won (4-0)
1952: Dems were in control, Redskins lost, Dems lost (5-0)
1956: Reps were in control, Redskins won, Reps won (6-0)
1960: Reps were in control, Redskins lost, Reps lost (7-0)
1964: Dems were in control, Redskins won, Dems won (8-0)
1968: Dems were in control, Redskins lost, Dems lost (9-0)
1972: Reps were in control, Redskins won, Reps won (10-0)
1976: Reps were in control, Redskins lost, Reps lost (11-0)
1980: Dems were in control, Redskins lost, Dems lost (12-0)
1984: Reps were in control, Redskins won, Reps won (13-0)
1988: Reps were in control, Redskins won, Reps won (14-0)
1992: Reps were in control, Redskins lost, Reps lost (15-0)
1996: Dems were in control, Redskins won, Dems won (16-0)
2000: Dems were in control, Redskins lost, Dems lost (17-0)
2004: Reps were in control, Redskins lost, Reps win (17-1)
2008: Reps were in control, Redskins lost, Reps lost (18-1)
With an 18-1 record, ill side with them! If 18-1 "holds no water", what does? _________________
KWSNImNotDead - "I don't want to go on the cart!". It is spelled LooNies. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mohrorless Mail Order Goat Bride


Joined: 09 Oct 2006 Posts: 11206 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
KWSN Im Not Dead wrote: | With an 18-1 record, ill side with them! If 18-1 "holds no water", what does? |
A cup _________________ Fetch me the Holy Hand Grenade!
Keeper of the Unending keg of PGGBs
Taunter in Training
Campaign Manager for Sir Shrubbery
Plus
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Al Dente Prince


Joined: 23 Feb 2006 Posts: 3228 Location: Leodis, the jewel at the end of the yellow brick road (or M1)
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 10:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is it safe to turn the TV on yet? _________________ Creationists believe they never evolved; I agree with them.
. . My Milestones . . My Full BOINC list |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mohrorless Mail Order Goat Bride


Joined: 09 Oct 2006 Posts: 11206 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 10:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
No _________________ Fetch me the Holy Hand Grenade!
Keeper of the Unending keg of PGGBs
Taunter in Training
Campaign Manager for Sir Shrubbery
Plus
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yankton Prince


Joined: 27 Sep 2008 Posts: 1702 Location: California
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 11:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Not for at least another four years, and even then, you'd just be looking at the aftermath of the disaster. _________________ Some days are worse than others. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Old woman(mann, sorry) Baron


Joined: 09 Nov 2007 Posts: 221 Location: Nottingham, England
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 5:43 pm Post subject: TV turn-on |
|
|
Sport, films, documentaries, comedy are the only things I turn it on for and I'm very selective about those.
I have averaged about 2 hours of tv per week for more than a year now.
Try it, it's easy.
Just don't turn it on. _________________ [img]http://boincstats.boincstats.com/search/all_projects.php?cpid=8fbcb4ce48ba412ccbb4337d9d2bf18a.gif[/img] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sir Hamster of Elderberry KWSN ArchBishop

Joined: 20 May 2002 Posts: 5117 Location: Beer City, Cheese Quadrant
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 7:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KWSN Im Not Dead wrote: | ...
With an 18-1 record, ill side with them! If 18-1 "holds no water", what does? |
Very small rocks!?! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|